Under these measurements, California’s poverty rate is higher than any other U.S. state—though it has improved since last year, when the Census Bureau reported that 20.4 percent of residents were living below the poverty line.
Those calculations are based on a statistic that the bureau introduced in 2011 called the “supplemental poverty measure.”
Unlike the traditional definition of poverty, which has been in use since the 1960s, the supplemental poverty measure takes into account the costs of housing, healthcare, and child care in the areas where people live.
By traditional measurements, 13.3 percent of Californians are impoverished, slightly under the national rate of 13.4 percent. But using the supplemental poverty measure, that share of residents rises to 19 percent.
The supplemental poverty measure also factors in forms of government assistance like housing subsidies and food stamps, as well as income. So pinpointing exactly why those numbers are so far apart is tricky. But the state’s pricy rents and soaring real estate values aren’t helping.
According to the report, housing costs were likely a key factor in boosting the supplemental poverty measure rate in the 16 states where this number was higher than the traditional poverty measure.
California renters pay around $1,447 per month in rents and utilities, according to the bureau’s latest estimates. That’s more than $300 above what renters can expect to pay nationwide ($1,012 per month).
Home prices in California are also far above those nationwide. For homeowners with a mortgage (as opposed to those who own their homes outright), median home values sit at $529,000. That’s more than twice the nationwide median of $239,800.
In Los Angeles County, real estate prices are even higher, with a median value of $595,400. Renter costs, on the other hand, are actually a bit lower than the statewide median. Renters here pay about $1,402 per month, according to the bureau’s estimates.
That doesn’t mean renters in LA don’t struggle to make ends meet. A recent report from Zillow found that the cost of housing eats up more monthly income in the LA area than in any other major U.S. city.
Homepage Follow Sign in Get started HOME READ LATEST AI BLOCKCHAIN STABLECOINS DATA SCIENCE HN PODCAST OPEN LETTERS HACKER JOBS Johnny Follow On a quest to optimize for judgment. Writer, Coder, Poker Player. Tweets on Books, Strategy, Decision Making, Psychology, Learning & Self Development. Oct 22 Everything I Knew About Reading Was Wrong https://hackernoon.com/everything-i-knew-about-reading-was-wrong-bde7e57fbfdc Everything I knew About Reading Was Wrong. I realized this about a year ago. All those rules I took for granted were holding me back. Once I let go, I rediscovered the joy in reading — something I haven’t felt since I was a teenager, skipping classes to read Nietzsche or Albert Camus. It all started with a podcast. It wasn’t even my insight. It was one of those rare occasions where you take someone’s advice, apply it to your life — and the results are instant and overw...
Homepage Follow Sign in Get started HOME READ LATEST AI BLOCKCHAIN STABLECOINS DATA SCIENCE HN PODCAST REAL $ TALK HACKER JOBS Anvay Rane Follow Exploring my options. "Just an Honest miner in an adversarial world." Oct 20 Evaluation of Bitcoin as a Store-of-Value https://hackernoon.com/evaluation-of-bitcoin-as-a-store-of-value-2cb0a7961713 Which is better, a friend of vast population, or a friend of immense gold? — Arthashastra The teacher says “a friend of vast population is better, inasmuch as such a friend will be of imposing power and can, when he rises up, accomplish any work undertaken.” Not so, says the student, “a friend possessing immense gold is better; for possession of gold is ever desirable, but an army is not always required. Moreover, armies and other desired objects can be purchased for gold.” Why do we have such common desirability for gold? We cannot eat the gold, wear...
Comments
Post a Comment